liberals

Sex and Santorum

by on January 6, 2012

The race for the Republican presidential nomination has been an edifying spectacle. No, really: we are learning a lot of things that we might not have if it had been a simple Romney coronation. until he rose in the polls, Ron Paul was seen by many liberals as an almost cuddly figure, a nice antiwar guy with some quirky ideas about gold; we’ve learned a bit since.

Now Rick Santorum, whose frankness gives us an education in what “moral values” is really about, at least for a significant number of people:

Santorum has long opposed the Supreme Court’s 1965 ruling “that invalidated a Connecticut law banning contraception” and has also pledged to completely defund federal funding for contraception if elected president. as he told CaffeinatedThoughts.com editor Shane Vander Hart in October, “One of the things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is I think the dangers of contraception in this country,” the former Pennsylvania senator explained. “It’s not okay. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.”

It is not left versus right- both are corrupt! Obama is just an extension of bush.

The Media is feeding peoples minds with bullsh!t. Kind of like what comes out of your ***.

thought provoking question but I would prefer what is the difference between candidates supporters in the Donkey party and the toilette!

The candidates and supporters are not a place where your head should be and the toilet is?

The difference between the White House and a vacuum cleaner

is the location of the Dirt Bag

Caca stays in the toilet and speed from the mouths of the debaters.

Liberals have traits like the toilet.

All it takes is a quick flush to clean out the toilet.

You smell like the toilet.

What's the difference between candidates and supporters at a GOP debate and the toilet?

Making no secret of his disdain for Tea Party ideals and ideas, ex-White House adviser Van Jones on Monday nonetheless urged liberal activists to “steal” the Tea Party’s playbook. the former “green jobs” adviser, speaking at the top of a three-day conference in the nation’s capital designed to galvanize liberal activists, spoke interchangeably in harsh and glowing terms about the Tea Party movement. he described their cause as “the worst” and “silly” and other unflattering adjectives. at the same time, he said progressives can learn from what the Tea Party has accomplished, as he tried to steer the crowd toward his own umbrella group which he’s been working on since the summer.  using the pick-yourself-up-by-the-bootstraps tone President Obama has employed in recent days, Jones pointed to the Tea Party movement as an example of grassroots activism done right. he suggested liberals have relied too much on one person, Obama, to fix everything.  only instead of taking to the streets in the name of lower taxes and less regulation, he urged the crowd to model its own Tea Party-style movement in the name of the middle class.  “If we can just be as warm and sharing and kind as the Tea Party, which one might suspect is a relatively low bar, we might be able to do something for our country,” Jones said Monday.  Obama has stirred controversy in recent days by urging the base to quit complaining, take off their “bedroom slippers” and march with him. Jones used similar language, as the three-day Take back the American Dream Conference got underway.  “We went from hopey to mopey and forgot to build a movement in the middle,” Jones said.  he credited the Tea Party with building a “network” that operates without any individual leader. ”There is no Tea Party. You can’t land at the airport here in D.C., and get in the cab and say ‘take me to Tea Party headquarters’,” he said.  Jones described the movement as an “upgrade” over what progressives had done.  “They use their charismatic leaders to build something bigger than any leader,” he said. “They talk rugged individualism, but they act collectively.”  By contrast, he said, “we talk collectively … but we have enacted the most individualistic strategy in the republic.”  Jones, at several points in the speech, referred to the emergence of a new “movement.”  he claimed the so-called American Dream Movement, which he launched over the summer, has attracted more interest from supporters than the Tea Party did in 2009. he and other progressive groups are trying to rally that sentiment into something more cohesive at the spirit-building conference in Washington.  But it also coincided with the more raucous anti-corporate protests on Wall Street and in cities across the country. the speakers with the Take back the American Dream Conference tried to show some solidarity with those protesters — Jones applauded them for going to the “scene of the crime.”  the message of those protesters, though, is not quite as cohesive as the message in Washington. Some of the protesters in New York, while organizing under the banner of combating corporate greed, talk about demolishing the capitalist system altogether.  Tea Party Express strategist Sal Russo described the various demonstrations as unfounded.  “The direction of the county has been decidedly to the left,” he said. “The policies have been so far left they don’t have anything to be unhappy about.”  But with unemployment topping 9 percent, Jones urged activists to focus on unemployment and standing up for those unable to find work. While protesters are calling for the abolition of capitalism on Wall Street, Jones urged activists to organize under a message that is both “positive” and “portable.”  “You can’t just have a principle that’ll work in Berkeley,” he said, adding that it has to resonate in “red states.”  the conference is being co-sponsored by the Campaign for America’s Future. the opening day of the conference featured several prominent speakers, including former Labor Secretary Robert Reich and Rep. Donna Edwards, D-Md. Jones’ group plans to take the event a step further Wednesday, organizing a “rally for jobs not cuts” outside the U.S. Capitol.  Jones is the former “green jobs” adviser for Obama. he resigned following controversy over some of his public comments and his signing on a years-old petition from a group that suggests the U.S. government was complicit in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Jones disavowed the so-called Sept. 11 “truth” group when the petition came out.  Jones referenced the incident on stage Monday in Washington.  “You can get knocked down, that happens in politics. ask me how I know,” Jones said, as the crowd chuckled. 

Van Jones Urges Progressives to ‘Steal’ Tea Party Strategy

president have attended the memorial service and made the speech and paid her a visit?
Hypothetically speaking, of course.

To be clear, if you’re using this event to criticize the “rhetoric” of mrs. Palin or others with whom you disagree, then you’re either: (a) asserting a connection between the “rhetoric” and the shooting, which based on evidence to date would be what we call a vicious lie; or (b) you’re not, in which case you’re just seizing on a tragedy to try to score unrelated political points, which is contemptible. Which is it?
I understand the desperation that Democrats must feel after taking a historic beating in the midterm elections and seeing the popularity of ObamaCare plummet while voters flee the party in droves. but those who purport to care about the health of our political community demonstrate precious little actual concern for America’s political well-being when they seize on any pretext, however flimsy, to call their political opponents accomplices to murder.

Of course. He's the President, nimrod. You don't seem to realize that violence and negative rhetoric are bad for the country, do you?

Everything would have been wildly different. Liberals would have said she asked for it, she deserved it, good riddance, etc.

Probably. there were more victims than Rep. Giffords.

msnbc would run their prison shows non stop until it blew over. unless they blamed palin for that too. "sara is history" just answered your question

Bachmann deserves it, Giffords didn't, big difference.

Yes. Obama isn't a judgmental partisan hack, unlike the conservatives here.

to samuel: Did Obama attend any memorial in Fort Hood shooting victims??

Of course he would have.

If instead of Gabrielle Giffords having been the victim, but a Republican like Michelle Bachmann, would the?

Since Sarah Palin and her e-mail is fair game to liberals, why don’t we try the same with Barak?

Let’s have the Heritage Foundation post the personal e-mail addresses, phone numbers and locations of Barak’s family members, and let’s start publishing all of his e-mails.

The liberals who did this to Palin as accomplices to the real hacker had absolutely no concept of privacy rights or the safety of Palin’s children. why should we have any respect for Obama’s?

When Are Liberals Going To Apologize for What John Gardner Did To Chelsea King?

Do they really know the meaning of LIBERAL?

How can the LIBERALS be offended by Meghan McCain’s Twitpic?

I try to blog on that blog, and anything I say which doesn’t go exactly along with their dogma is jumped on. MyDD is tolerable, and actually a good blog. why is DKos so radical?

Why are Daily Kos bloggers so much more radical than most liberals?

Elizabeth Birnbaum fired from MMS

The official estimates of the Gulf oil spill have been revised upwards to 4x greater than previously stated, making this disaster far larger than the Exxon Valdez. it was partly pressure from liberals that forced BP to permit independent scientists to make these better estimates, instead of trusting the lowballed numbers that BP execs tried Original post: Elizabeth Birnbaum fired from MMS from Best Breaking News , post Elizabeth Birnbaum fired from MMS Post Footer automatically generated by wp-posturl plugin for wordpress

Continue reading here:
Elizabeth Birnbaum fired from MMS

admin on may 27, 2010 | Filed under News

I see that many liberals are concerned with minimum wage jobs, but I am wondering what prevents liberals from creating a business and paying their employees a “living wage”.

Why do they appeal to the government for change rather than bring change themselves?

What prevents liberals from creating jobs and hiring people a “living wage”?