What is gay marriage? a marriage consists of a wife (the woman) and a husband (the man). Can one person be a wife one day and a husband the next day? Is it decided at the time of this marriage that one person will be always be the husband and the other the wife? or are the concepts of husband and wife to be thrown away like so many other outdated and useless old concepts?
Two people of the same sex committing their lives to each other constitutes a friendship, not a marriage. People often ask why it has to be that way. If two people love each other why shouldn’t they have the right to get married? the fact is, if two people of the same sex want to have a ceremony and dedicate their lives to each other, they can call it a marriage and no one will come and knock on their doors to stop them. the United States is a tolerant country and Americans are a tolerant people who accept the fact that people are different.
But people want same sex marriage to be recognized by the law and this means that other people have to accept the idea that a man can marry a man or a woman can marry a woman which to most people, on the face of it, is ridiculous. there is a difference with identifying your own relationship as a marriage and forcing other people to abide by that classification.
Liberals on the left and libertarians on the right may ask why the government should be in the marriage business anyway? Andrew Napolitano of Fox news said government should not try to stand in the way of a marriage between two people. so in his mind, as long as a marriage is between two people, it doesn’t matter if they are of the same sex.
If that is the case, why does the definition of marriage have to stop at two people? In fact, in this day and age, when a husband and wife often both have to work, why not have a husband and two wives? Instead of sending kids to get day care by strangers or hiring a nanny, the kids can have two legitimate mothers. one mother can work and the other can take care of the children.
Changing the definition of marriage can be rationalized in many different ways. At some point, if it is to have any meaning, it has to have a definition. Every relationship between individuals does not constitute a marriage.
Some people look at same sex marriage as a civil rights issue. This is incorrect as well. there are no separate rules for straight people vs. gay people. Every man has the right to marry every woman and every woman has the right to marry every man. It is not as if one group has one set of rules and another group has a different set of rules. If a man doesn’t want to marry a woman, he doesn’t have to do so. No one in society is forced to get married.
That marriage exists between a man and a woman is a self evident truth that most people, whether they want to admit it or not, know instinctively to be true. all the rationalizations and twisting of logic and the calling of people who feel that same sex marriage is a ludicrous idea ‘Homophobes’ does not change this reality.
At the heart of the movement to legalize same sex marriage is something far more insidious than the idea that two people of the same sex should be allowed to get married. same sex marriage is an attack on the institutions, traditions and stability of the country.
Aldous Huxley, in his forward to a Brave New World wrote the following: In a few years, marriage licenses will be sold like dog licenses, good for a period of twelve months, with no law against changing dogs or keeping more than one animal at a time. As political and economic freedom diminishes, sexual freedom tends compensatingly to increase. and the dictator … will do well to encourage that freedom … it will help to reconcile his subjects to the servitude which is their fate.
In the classic novel Brave New World, history and traditions are wiped out. Classic works of literature are eliminated. the only thing that matters is stimulation of the senses where promiscuity is encouraged and rewarded. Thus this conversation from the book:
Lenina: Somehow… I hadn’t been feeling very keen on promiscuity lately.
Fanny: but one’s got to make the effort … After all, every one belongs to every one else.
We are constantly hearing from the left about how we need to think less of ourselves and sacrifice more for others. They never talk about the successful traditions of the past. They don’t talk about religion or God. the left seems to have an inherent hatred for all religious and time tested traditions. Gay marriage is their perfect vehicle to diminish these traditions.
For a dictatorship to thrive, all the traditions that came before must be discredited. one of the most important traditions in any civilized society is the idea of the family. By blurring the most basic, common sense idea – that marriage is between a man and a woman, you are opening up the door to making everything subjective. some things ARE black or white with no gray in between.
Barack Obama mentor and left wing agitator/community organizer Saul Alinsky understood this all too well when he said: an organizer working in and for an open society is in an ideological dilemma to begin with, he does not have a fixed truth — truth to him is relative and changing; everything to him is relative and changing.. To the extent that he is free from the shackles of dogma, he can respond to the realities of the widely different situations.
At some point people have to make a stand for reality and truth. some things are so obvious that there is no rational argument to be made. the left has made people question their own gut instincts. a country is more than a group of people living within defined boundaries. a country is defined by ideas and values. when a dictator wants control of a country he must attack it at its foundation. make a country mean nothing, make it stand for nothing, and there is nothing left to fight to preserve – nothing to stand in the way of the would-be dictator because nothing is left worth defending.
When you walk into a corporate building in the month of June, you are likely to see a sign that says the following: XYZ Company is proud to celebrate Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender month. Is XYZ Company proud to celebrate this or is it afraid NOT to celebrate it? At the risk of attracting the wrath of all the compassionate people out there, if you’re going to celebrate Transgender month, how about a celebration for schizophrenia? Where is the month celebrating Obsessive Compulsive Disorder? How about signs in the corporate lobby saying XYZ Company is proud to celebrate Bipolar Manic-depressive month?
We have become a society of people that enjoy the thrill of a 3-D movie but can’t name any Supreme Court justices. we are a society of people that know all the contestants on American Idol but can’t name the current Vice President (of course many people who DO know who the Vice President is often wish they were part of the group that didn’t). In short, this is a society made up of people who have become gullible to the stimulus around them provided by the left. They have been told to be tolerant and non-judgmental. By the way, every time people use their brains they are being judgmental so when people tell you to stop being judgmental they are basically telling you to stop thinking. we are getting closer and closer to Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.
Is same sex marriage an important enough issue to debate and legislate? Is it even worth writing about while so many really dangerous things are happening? People were asked to tolerate differences, and most agreed that it was the right thing to do. but toleration is not celebration.
The United States is a country of individual rights and individual responsibilities. Though many have tried to pervert what the framers of the constitution meant, their main idea was that human rights come from our Creator, not from other people. In other words, the founding of this country had a religious and moral beginning and it is that idea that has been the backbone of the country’s success. that success will not continue if we abandon those principles.
